SUPP反击DAP要求增加州议席、加强“制衡”的说法，围绕砂拉越下一届州选举的政治攻防在古晋升温。 8月24日，SUPP古晋支部青年团，以及古晋Kota Sentosa州议员兼该党副财政叶耀星（Wilfred Yap Yau Sin）分别发表声明。他们认为，增加DAP议员并不自动等于更好的施政，真正的制衡应包括政策辩论、建设性批评，以及维护砂拉越在《1963年马来西亚协议》（MA63）下的利益。SUPP也质疑DAP身为联邦政府成员，却只在砂拉越强调制衡；这属于SUPP的政治指控，并非已经独立证实的事实。 这场交锋的背景，是DAP砂拉越主席张健仁（Chong Chieng Jen）呼吁选民，不要让他和杨薇讳（Violet Yong Wui Wui）成为砂拉越州议会内仅有的两名DAP代表，并希望获得更多议席发挥制衡作用。 对古晋选民来说，目前确认的是各党公开立场，不是政府新政策：现有州议会席位没有因此改变，报道也没有公布选举时间表。接下来比较各党在MA63、联邦与州财政、天然资源、教育和医疗课题上的具体记录与方案，会比只看竞选口号更有用。后续应留意DAP是否提出实质回应，以及选举委员会何时正式公布选举安排。

SUPP has hit back at DAP’s call for more opposition seats in the next Sarawak state election, turning “check and balance” into the latest line of political contest. Separate statements reported in Kuching on Aug 24 came from SUPP Kuching Branch Youth and Kota Sentosa assemblyman Wilfred Yap, who is also the party’s deputy treasurer. They argued that more DAP seats would not automatically mean better governance, and said scrutiny should be tied to policy debate and Sarawak’s interests under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). The branch also accused DAP of being selective when criticising Sarawak while being part of the federal government. That remains SUPP’s political claim, not an independently established finding. The immediate trigger was DAP Sarawak chairman Chong Chieng Jen’s appeal for voters not to leave him and Violet Yong as the party’s only two representatives in the Sarawak Legislative Assembly, and to give DAP more room to provide checks and balance. For Kuching voters, this is a political position-taking exercise, not a government decision: the statements do not change the current assembly composition or announce an election timetable. As the debate develops, voters can compare each party’s concrete record and proposals on MA63, federal-state finances, natural resources, education and healthcare instead of treating slogans as policy. The next useful signals are a substantive DAP response and any formal election timetable issued by the Election Commission.